The peer review process is an important part of publishing papers in high-quality scientific journals. Libertas Academica believes that the peer review process is not only a method to screen out poor articles, but it is one of the best ways of improving good articles and making them even better. When you submit a paper to Libertas you will be gaining highly regarded intellectual support from our expert peer reviewers, and see your work from a new perspective.
Dr Pedro Magalhaes from Agostinho Neto University in Angola writes: “I was very satisfied with the rapid and high-quality review process and the constructive feedback. The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly.”
We use the blind peer report method to give you objective and balanced feedback on your work. Our Editors in Chief act as final editorial decision-makers in the peer reviewing process ensuring that the feedback from reviewers is constructive and comprehensive enough to be of significant use to you as the author. We keep the peer reviewers of papers anonymous to ensure that all the review comments will be fair and objective and based solely on the intellectual merit of your work.
Dr Zaretsky from Tel Aviv University in Israel writes: “The comments from reviewers and associate editor were high quality, scientifically deep and objective. It was a great pleasure to cooperate with such qualified and friendly team.”
We only accept people who are experts in their field to peer-review for us and to join the editorial boards for our journals. This guarantees you will always get high quality and subject-appropriate reviewers for all of your submissions.
Dr Zhou from the University of California in the USA writes: “The comments from reviewers and associate editor are high quality and insightful”
Read what more authors have said about our publication process here and see how easy it can be to submit your paper
Posts
